
Educators: Earn a free Gold upgrade by joining the PBwiki Back To School Challenge.
You and others working in your medium will collaborate on designing a rubric for evaluating the final product, using the tools provided to you here
Autumn and Krystina- Child Abuse: A Call to Action iMovie (no peeking until the twelfth!) http://youtube.com/watch?v=XsqLzixZfCQ
Ashley and Breeyn - One Shot to Save a Life iMovie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7K6FnHIObs
Jaime- United States Oil Consumption iMovie http://youtube.com/watch?v=SJqt_Xhe9Xw
Frank- Free Tibet
Free Tibet Facebook group: Free Tibet Group
imovie without film and voiceover: Jess and I came up with this, what do we think? Check it out on our page or here: Check it Out!(I really like this one!!-Ashley)
Alexis' Group:
Important note from Dr. Sarver: I need to know which rubric is for the moving image group; and which is from the still image group. Please label them clearly so that your classmates know which one to edit/revise comment upon. Ultimately, there should be two rubrics here only. Please do this as soon as possible. (4/11/08 8am).
Sarver-iMovie%2BRubric[1].doc: Dr. Sarver, this rubric was made by and for the moving image group. -Ashley
iMovie Rubric final.doc (in need of "fleshing out" before it's usable)
This seems to be a concise and appropriate rubric.. I applied it to the drum lessons video, and I can see why you chose it for satisfactory. Good job! -Garrett G
I agree, our rubric for the moving image group seems great! - Stacia
With others in your group, find 3 examples online of productions that represent the full range of quality in the medium (make sure these are permanently and publicly accessible): these creations should show the full spectrum of what's possible, ranging from what you'd deem excellence (with all the appropriate bells and whistles that function to enhance the users' experience/understanding) to shoddy or poor work (that perhaps use bells and whistles simply for the sake of using them or, on the other hand, don't really maximize the medium's potential for enhancing the user's experience/understanding of the message).
Discuss with your group what makes these examples excellent, satisfactory, and poor.
Once you've agreed, copy links onto this wiki page, and briefly describe just beneath the link your rationale for your assessment of each.
Excellent
Discuss:
This movie was considered because it had a clear purpose and was successful at meeting it's objective.
It was easy to follow as well as interesting to watch.
You could tell that the creaters thought about what they were going to produce ahead of time as well as edited their final work.
This video is not entertaining enough; it is too informative.
The creator used crude examples (cut up printed pieces of paper) as someone who is an authority on computers the creators should have perhaps used screenshots instead, if possible.
This movie is clear and teaches you what it promises: How to use wikis. It integrates all elements and uses them in creative, fresh way.
Final Choice: http://eng307.wordpress.com/page/3/">Visual Literacy Testimony
Rationale (for selection as excellent -- in re: other candidates for this category and examples in other two):
This video's message is clear and easily understood by the audience.
The voice over for the clip is easily understood and exceptionally clear.
This video emotionally reaches the viewer.
The video is entertaining and intriguing
The shots used throughout this video are clear and steady as well a dynamic, as they provide a variety of angles and camera views.
The music choosen for the background evokes an emotional response to the images.
The creator presented text which was computer generated.
This video is neat and thorough.
Satisfactory
Discuss:
Does integrate text on screen.
Provides valuable resources for free.
Host's voice seems muffeled at times and the acoustics of the room and drum kit/audio are marginal
Host sits only partially facing camera, different camera angles would be a great benefit.
This video serves its purpose. It doesnt integrate much creaitvity but gets everything done.
Final Choice: Go Green
Rationale (for selection as excellent -- in re: other candidates for this category and examples in other two):
The reason why this video is satisfactory is because the statistics were animated too quickly and did not allow enough time for the audience to completely read them.
Also the text was almost invisible at times, although it has a clear message being sent- the important details are lost in the graphics.
Despite these downfalls the topic is an important one to all people and the information was quite suprising and was not what would be considered common knowledge to all.
Too many facts were stated. The long paragraphs on the pages would be more effective if they were short meaningful phrases.
The best part if this movie is the emotional effect it has on its readers.
Poor
Discuss:
There was nothing to this clip but talking about one subject. Besides the films obvious nature, there was no content or images to support it.
The video uses no transitions or other editing techniques.
The video was semi-entertaining but became rediculous very quickly.
The video is completely useless in the classroom setting.
This video is strictly an opinion, making it biased. There isnt any real facts. It's silly.
Final Choice: The Lobster iMovie To End All Lobster Movies
Rationale (for selection as excellent -- in re: other candidates for this category and examples in other two):
This video does not have any sound.
The facts stated are not true.
This video is ridiculous. but funny.
Using the above example of excellence as your model, list the characteristics of a quality production in this genre/medium on the respective page of this wiki (click on the "Sidebar" link above);
Characteristics of Excellent iMovies/Digital Stories
#
#
When you are through, share this list with me to get approval before moving ahead to the next step.
Based on this work, create a rubric for all work in the medium at rubistar and save this rubric with a password and login that you note here:
Group login:
Group password:
Link to rubric:
Paste link to rubric here and remove this text
After class, you will share this rubric with classmates working with other media to make sure that the work/expectations are equitable across media. Classmembers not working in this medium must note their approval or suggest changes by making comments by the beginning of class on 4/7.
Taking into account my and other classmembers' comments, work with members of your medium group to revise the rubric. The revised and final rubric must be completed by class time on 4/14 (after which I will check and assess it).
List the name of your project and project team members's names and contact info here. Add lines to the table if necessary.
Name your project as follows: Your Project Name (medium). For example, NCLB in CNY (iMovie) or Cortland's Homeless (podcast).
| Project Name | Team Member | e-mail address | Phone Number/Screen names |
| Anti-Semitism in Cortland (iMovie) | Alexis Kawalick
|
kawali25@cortland.edu | 845-642-7200/LexiLoo029 |
| Kaitlyn Tainter | tainte97@cortland.edu | ||
| Stacia Derdzinski | spadaysha@aol.com | ||
| Jacie Westphal | westphal94@cortland.edu | ||
| Jessica Whalan | jessamail16@hotmail.com | 845-798-5874/jessw1687 | |
| Kristin Beylo | beylo53@cortland.edu | 607-761-8783/ kbkiszes32 | |
| Krystina Hardter | hardte50@cortland.edu | ||
| Autumn Bifano
|
bifano57@cortland.edu | ||
|
|
Meghan Ida
|
ida92@corltand.edu
|
516-707-8702/cutiemeggs87 |
| Janet Boyle
|
boyle87@cortland.edu | ||
| One Shot to Save a Life (imovie) | Ashley Keith
|
keith67@cortland.edu | 607-349-8059/sassley23 |
| Breeyn Bengston
|
bengts93@cortland.edu |
315-224-5009 blondie032000 |
|
| Free Tibet (iMovie)
|
Frank D'Abramo | frankiecrash7@optonline.net |
631-478-2430 FDAbramo |
| American Oil Consumption (iMovie)
|
Jaime DeMartini | jaime.demartini@gmail.com |
516-672-1864 jayms77 |
| Child Abuse Awareness |
Autumn Bifano
Krystina Hardter |
|
631-357-4129 fallnanjel86
315-480-2905 krysitta |
I will be driving home at that time, but if everyone else can meet online at that time, you can find examples and I can list reasons why they fit into that category. Alexis
Thursday at 8pm is fine with me
Frank
~8pm is good for me!
Ashley
Get out of the edit mode on this page by clicking on "Save" below. (As you work on this section, I recommend either printing this page out OR using two computers OR shuttling between two browser windows on the same computer: use one to make changes on, while reading these directions from the other).
Create a New Page
Create a Link to your New Page in the "SidebBar"
Creating a link from this page
Copy EVERYTHING on this page from "Production Schedule" to the bottom of this page (below) and paste it onto your Project Wiki Page.
Complete these tasks in this order (to be completed by 4/7):
Otherwise, this page is the space and creation of you and your group member's. Use it to collaborate asynchronously. But note that if you want to have a virtual meeting, you can insert a plugin from the toolbar above to engage in synchronous chat.
Working with others on your project team (most likely a subset of the "medium group," if there are several different projects being created in this medium"), you will create a Production Schedule for your project.
Steps:
TO DO LIST (See #2 above)
#
#
MIDTERM DRAFT
(See #3 above)
PRODUCTION SCHEDULE
M March 31 (PREPRODUCTION)
To do: Schedule group a) training and b) a "midterm"/follow-up meeting with Tera Doty-Blance (type dates of meetings below).
Person responsible: _________________________
M April 7 (PREPRODUCTION/PRODUCTION)
Deadline: Project Proposal, Rubric, Production Schedule, and pre-filled Peer Evaluation forms
M April 14 (PRODUCTION)
Deadline: Have met with trainer
M April 21 (PRODUCTION/POSTPRODUCTION)
Deadline: Draft of Project due
M April 28 (POSTPRODUCTION)
M May 5 (PUBLISH)
Deadline: Final draft due
Revised Project Proposal Attached Here
Pre-fill "Confidential Peer Evaluation" forms
Once you are finished with the Production Schedule, copy and paste from it in order to pre-fill the weekly "Confidential Peer Evaluation" forms and attach the completed, pre-filled form beneath the appropriate date below.
Pre-fill it by following these directions:
Be sure to divide this inputting among group members so that the work is equitably divided amongst group members. DUE: March 31
WEEKLY: Complete the "Confidential Peer Evaluation" forms
Each week, each group member will download one copy of that week's form, evaluate each group member's performance (including him or herself) BEFORE class begins, and submit the confidential form to me at the beginning of class. Forms not completed before class will not be accepted, and the indivdiual will receive "0" points for that week's assessment.
If individual tasks have changed since the form was first pre-filled, be sure to note these changes on the wiki no later than Monday at 8am for that day's evaluation.
Deadline: Project Proposal, Rubric, Production Schedule, and pre-filled Peer Evaluation forms
Paste Pre-Filled Eval form here and delete this text
M April 14 (PRODUCTION)
Deadline: Have met with trainer
Paste Pre-Filled Eval form here and delete this text
M April 21 (PRODUCTION/POSTPRODUCTION)
Deadline: Draft of Project due
Paste Pre-Filled Eval form here and delete this text
M April 28 (POSTPRODUCTION)
Paste Pre-Filled Eval form here and delete this text
M May 5 (PUBLISH)
Deadline: Final draft due
Paste Pre-Filled Eval form here and delete this text
A truly AMAZING clearinghouse of useful resources on digital video (production, etc.)
http://www.socialtext.net/medialiteracy/index.cgi?digital_video_resources
Amanda Yacashin's iMovie from ENG 506
Dr. Sarver's del.icio.us acct:
search bookmarks for "video"
“10 minute film school”
http://www.exposure.co.uk/makers/minute.html
“Kid’s Vid”
http://kidsvid.altec.org/index.html
Digital storytelling -- elements
http://www.inms.umn.edu/elements/media.php?title=Media
Digital storytelling -- steps
http://ourmedia.org/node/253810
Page Information
|
Wiki Information |
Recent PBwiki Blog Posts |